Measuring the Attitudes of Pre-Service Special Education Teachers in Malang City

Total Responden: 262

Demographic Questions

Age

  • < 25 years
    226 (86.3%)
  • 25–34
    22 (8.4%)
  • 35–44
    9 (3.4%)
  • >55
    1 (0.4%)
  • 45–54
    4 (1.5%)

Country

Menampilkan 0 data

Gender

  • female
    225 (85.9%)
  • male
    31 (11.8%)
  • prefer not to say/other
    6 (2.3%)

Years of teaching experience

  • <5 years
    220 (84.0%)
  • 5–10 years
    17 (6.5%)
  • >20 years
    13 (5.0%)
  • 11–20 years
    12 (4.6%)

Teaching level

  • preschool
    87 (33.2%)
  • higher education
    26 (9.9%)
  • secondary
    18 (6.9%)
  • primary
    121 (46.2%)
  • vocational
    10 (3.8%)

Subject area taught

  • special education
    173 (66.0%)
  • mathematics
    4 (1.5%)
  • general
    69 (26.3%)
  • social
    4 (1.5%)
  • arts
    10 (3.8%)
  • science
    2 (0.8%)

Type of school

  • inclusive
    67 (25.6%)
  • public
    53 (20.2%)
  • special needs school
    124 (47.3%)
  • private
    8 (3.1%)
  • rural/urban
    3 (1.1%)
  • international
    7 (2.7%)

Training in inclusive education

  • short course
    65 (24.8%)
  • none
    109 (41.6%)
  • certification
    41 (15.6%)
  • formal degree program
    47 (17.9%)

Item Demographic Data

Item Demographic Data N %
Age
25–34 22 8.4
35–44 9 3.4
45–54 4 1.5
< 25 years 226 86.3
>55 1 0.4
Gender
female 225 85.9
male 31 11.8
prefer not to say/other 6 2.3
Years of teaching experience
11–20 years 12 4.6
5–10 years 17 6.5
<5 years 220 84.0
>20 years 13 5.0
Teaching level
higher education 26 9.9
preschool 87 33.2
primary 121 46.2
secondary 18 6.9
vocational 10 3.8
Subject area taught
arts 10 3.8
general 69 26.3
mathematics 4 1.5
science 2 0.8
social 4 1.5
special education 173 66.0
Type of school
inclusive 67 25.6
international 7 2.7
private 8 3.1
public 53 20.2
rural/urban 3 1.1
special needs school 124 47.3
Training in inclusive education
certification 41 15.6
formal degree program 47 17.9
none 109 41.6
short course 65 24.8

Measuring the Attitudes of Pre-Service Special Education Teachers in Malang City based on demographic characteristics

Demographic Characteristics M (Mean) SD F Sig. (P)
Age 0.896 0.467
25–34 134.23 13.483
35–44 129.78 12.998
45–54 129.00 6.218
< 25 years 129.43 17.602
>55 154.00 0.000
Gender 2.680 0.070
female 130.79 16.145
male 123.32 22.559
prefer not to say/other 131.83 13.014
Years of teaching experience 0.462 0.709
11–20 years 126.67 6.184
5–10 years 128.82 20.354
<5 years 129.93 17.324
>20 years 134.38 15.436
Teaching level 1.158 0.330
higher education 134.23 16.447
preschool 127.99 21.430
primary 130.88 13.119
secondary 125.39 18.286
vocational 132.30 15.283
Subject area taught 0.964 0.440
arts 131.70 15.514
general 126.97 17.441
mathematics 123.50 13.916
science 120.00 5.657
social 126.25 5.315
special education 131.36 17.235
Type of school 0.395 0.852
inclusive 130.01 12.075
international 135.71 15.403
private 126.25 7.686
public 128.15 17.747
rural/urban 133.33 10.408
special needs school 130.48 19.633
Training in inclusive education 3.926 0.009
certification 133.80 17.126
formal degree program 134.70 16.269
none 126.08 18.166
short course 130.49 14.347
* Catatan: Nilai P (*) menandakan perhitungan signifikansi memerlukan software statistik khusus. Jika angka P muncul, itu adalah estimasi. Nilai F dihitung menggunakan metode One-Way ANOVA.

Deskripsi Analisis (Grafik)

1. Regular classroom settings can create a comfortable classroom environment for all students, including students with SEN.

Mean: 4.03 Manner: 0
Skor 1 3%
Skor 2 2%
Skor 3 16%
Skor 4 50%
Skor 5 30%

2. Students with SEN entering regular classrooms are effective because they can learn the social skills necessary for success.

Mean: 3.74 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 5%
Skor 3 24%
Skor 4 57%
Skor 5 12%

3. All students, regardless of their abilities, deserve equal opportunities to participate in classroom activities.

Mean: 4.27 Manner: 0
Skor 1 3%
Skor 2 0%
Skor 3 9%
Skor 4 44%
Skor 5 45%

4. Teachers should foster peer support and collaboration among students with and without SEN.

Mean: 4.05 Manner: 0
Skor 1 3%
Skor 2 3%
Skor 3 12%
Skor 4 49%
Skor 5 33%

5. I believe that all students, including those with special educational needs, can thrive in a supportive and inclusive classroom environment.

Mean: 4.21 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 2%
Skor 3 13%
Skor 4 39%
Skor 5 44%

6. I make deliberate efforts to include students with SEN in all classroom activities and discussions.

Mean: 3.92 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 1%
Skor 3 22%
Skor 4 52%
Skor 5 23%

7. I am committed to creating a learning environment where every student feels respected and valued regardless of their abilities.

Mean: 4.21 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 1%
Skor 3 10%
Skor 4 47%
Skor 5 40%

8. It is difficult to maintain discipline in a regular classroom that contains students with SEN.

Mean: 3.22 Manner: 1
Skor 1 4%
Skor 2 13%
Skor 3 45%
Skor 4 32%
Skor 5 5%

9. Students with SEN tend to create confusion in regular classrooms.

Mean: 3.22 Manner: 1
Skor 1 3%
Skor 2 18%
Skor 3 38%
Skor 4 33%
Skor 5 7%

10. The behaviour of students with SEN sets a bad example for other students.

Mean: 2.49 Manner: 1
Skor 1 15%
Skor 2 44%
Skor 3 21%
Skor 4 16%
Skor 5 4%

11. Most of the students with SEN do not make an adequate effort to complete their assignments.

Mean: 3.06 Manner: 1
Skor 1 4%
Skor 2 22%
Skor 3 45%
Skor 4 24%
Skor 5 6%

12. I get frustrated when I have difficulty communicating with students with SEN.

Mean: 2.85 Manner: 1
Skor 1 8%
Skor 2 29%
Skor 3 35%
Skor 4 23%
Skor 5 4%

13. I get upset when students with SEN cannot follow the lessons in my classroom.

Mean: 2.61 Manner: 1
Skor 1 12%
Skor 2 37%
Skor 3 32%
Skor 4 15%
Skor 5 3%

14. I get irritated when I am unable to understand students with SEN.

Mean: 2.95 Manner: 1
Skor 1 8%
Skor 2 25%
Skor 3 36%
Skor 4 26%
Skor 5 5%

15. I get frustrated when I have to adapt the lesson to meet the individual needs of all students.

Mean: 2.62 Manner: 1
Skor 1 13%
Skor 2 35%
Skor 3 32%
Skor 4 16%
Skor 5 4%

16. Students with SEN distract teachers from addressing the needs of other students.

Mean: 2.85 Manner: 1
Skor 1 7%
Skor 2 30%
Skor 3 39%
Skor 4 18%
Skor 5 6%

17. It is challenging to use the same teaching method for all students in inclusive classrooms.

Mean: 3.65 Manner: 1
Skor 1 3%
Skor 2 7%
Skor 3 26%
Skor 4 48%
Skor 5 15%

18. Inclusive education for all students is unrealistic because regular classroom teachers cannot be sufficiently retrained to handle the demands.

Mean: 3.12 Manner: 1
Skor 1 3%
Skor 2 22%
Skor 3 42%
Skor 4 25%
Skor 5 8%

19. Students with SEN monopolize teachers’ time.

Mean: 2.68 Manner: 1
Skor 1 10%
Skor 2 35%
Skor 3 35%
Skor 4 14%
Skor 5 5%

20. My workload will be increased if I have students with SEN in my class.

Mean: 2.9 Manner: 1
Skor 1 9%
Skor 2 29%
Skor 3 34%
Skor 4 21%
Skor 5 8%

21. I will be more stressed if I have students with SEN in my class.

Mean: 2.57 Manner: 1
Skor 1 14%
Skor 2 37%
Skor 3 32%
Skor 4 11%
Skor 5 5%

22. As a teacher, I am responsible for ensuring that all students, including those with SEN, can learn effectively.

Mean: 4.03 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 2%
Skor 3 17%
Skor 4 50%
Skor 5 29%

23. Collaboration with special education staff is part of my duty in an inclusive classroom.

Mean: 4.11 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 1%
Skor 3 15%
Skor 4 52%
Skor 5 31%

24. I am confident that inclusive classrooms can be successfully implemented on a large scale and will have positive effects on students.

Mean: 3.95 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 1%
Skor 3 20%
Skor 4 55%
Skor 5 23%

25. I have received sufficient training on inclusive education practices.

Mean: 3.52 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 10%
Skor 3 33%
Skor 4 43%
Skor 5 12%

26. I know how to modify lesson plans to accommodate students with different needs.

Mean: 3.66 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 4%
Skor 3 32%
Skor 4 50%
Skor 5 12%

27. I feel confident in implementing inclusive teaching strategies.

Mean: 3.69 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 3%
Skor 3 30%
Skor 4 52%
Skor 5 13%

28. I understand the difference between integration and inclusion in educational settings.

Mean: 3.73 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 3%
Skor 3 29%
Skor 4 52%
Skor 5 14%

29. I am aware of various instructional strategies that can accommodate diverse learning needs in inclusive classrooms.

Mean: 3.73 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 4%
Skor 3 27%
Skor 4 55%
Skor 5 13%

30. I feel well-prepared to implement inclusive education practices based on my professional training and experiences.

Mean: 3.72 Manner: 0
Skor 1 2%
Skor 2 2%
Skor 3 31%
Skor 4 51%
Skor 5 14%

31. It is rare that students with SEN have to drop out from regular classrooms to meet their educational needs.

Mean: 3.21 Manner: 0
Skor 1 4%
Skor 2 11%
Skor 3 50%
Skor 4 30%
Skor 5 5%

32. I will not receive enough incentives (e.g., additional remuneration or allowance) to integrate students with SEN.

Mean: 3.21 Manner: 1
Skor 1 4%
Skor 2 10%
Skor 3 52%
Skor 4 28%
Skor 5 6%

33. There will be inadequate special teachers who are available to support inclusive education.

Mean: 3.23 Manner: 1
Skor 1 7%
Skor 2 15%
Skor 3 35%
Skor 4 33%
Skor 5 10%

34. My school will not have adequate special education instructional materials and teaching aids, e.g., Braille.

Mean: 2.74 Manner: 1
Skor 1 11%
Skor 2 30%
Skor 3 36%
Skor 4 18%
Skor 5 5%

35. Students with special educational needs are not accepted into regular schools because they do not qualify for the selection of new students.

Mean: 2.84 Manner: 1
Skor 1 11%
Skor 2 26%
Skor 3 39%
Skor 4 16%
Skor 5 8%

36. This country does not yet have a curriculum for inclusive education, so it cannot be adequately applied.

Mean: 3.31 Manner: 1
Skor 1 3%
Skor 2 16%
Skor 3 40%
Skor 4 32%
Skor 5 10%

37. Inclusive education promotes a more just and equitable education system.

Mean: 4.02 Manner: 0
Skor 1 1%
Skor 2 1%
Skor 3 23%
Skor 4 44%
Skor 5 31%

38. Lack of policy support hinders the successful implementation of inclusive education.

Mean: 3.98 Manner: 1
Skor 1 1%
Skor 2 1%
Skor 3 22%
Skor 4 50%
Skor 5 26%